+919278978978

JUSTICE FOR ATUL SUBHASH

JUSTICE FOR ATUL SUBHASH JUSTICE FOR ATUL SUBHASH JUSTICE FOR ATUL SUBHASH

JUSTICE FOR ATUL SUBHASH

JUSTICE FOR ATUL SUBHASH JUSTICE FOR ATUL SUBHASH JUSTICE FOR ATUL SUBHASH

+919278978978

  • Home
  • Truck
  • Stories
    • Podcast 1
    • Podcast 2
    • Podcast 3
    • Podcast 4
  • Cases
    • Dead Men
    • Nikita got Bail
    • Atul Son Custody

Join Atul18March2025 in Making a Difference

Background

 

Marriage and divorce

Subhash was originally from Uttar Pradesh and was involved in a divorce and custody dispute with his estranged wife, Nikita Singhania. The couple, married in 2019, lived separately for three years, and had a four-year-old son together. Allegations of harassment, extortion, and financial demands marked the divorce proceedings. Before his death, Subhash left behind a 24-page document and an 81‑minute video recording. In these documents, he expressed his concerns and grievances regarding his divorce and custody case.

Court proceedings

 

Subhash's note contained allegations that his in-laws had requested a settlement of ₹30 million (approximately $350,000 US dollars) as part of the divorce proceedings. He was denied visitation rights to see his son unless he complied with these financial demands. The legal proceedings included multiple accusations against him, including domestic violence and dowry harassment. He also stated that the legal system, that it was biased, particularly Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, which aims to protect women from domestic violence and dowry-related harassment.

He also accused the Jaunpur District Court judge, Reeta Kaushik, of asking for a 5 lakh bribe to settle the case, and taunting him into committing suicide when he refused.

Men As ATM

 

Subhash left behind a suicide note titled "This ATM has been closed permanently", which became a rally cry for victims of the Legal System in India, and allowed them to seek help from human rights organizations such as Save Indian Family Foundation.

The death of Subhash led to widespread discussion and debate about the rights of men in India. Some advocates argued that reforms are needed in the family law system, citing concerns about potential misuse of existing laws. A police investigation was conducted, and Singhania and several family members were charged under Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) related to abetment to suicide.The Bengaluru Court granted them bail in December 2024.

Atul's case also resulted in attention to various similar men who committed suicides after judicial abuse, such as Suresh Sathadiya, Nitin Padiyar, and Puneet Khurana.

+919278978978

Copyright © 2025 #JusticeIsDue - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept